Financial analyst (Mudra finance company) | Posted on | Science-Technology
Blogger | Posted on
A few people say in Indus Valley progress the improvement of science happened in light of Astrology. To anticipate all the more precisely about future, arithmetic came into picture thus the number frameworks.
0 Comment
Working with holistic nutrition.. | Posted on
Ask any
astrologer and they would confidently claim that astrology is a part of
science. And they would toss all kinds of theories to prove their point.
However, the other side of this matter is completely different.
Till now, many
scientific researches have been done. But no hard-hitting evidence has been
found to support the premise of astrology. In countless controlled studies,
astrology failed to find scientific validity.
This is not to
say that you won’t find articles on many renowned websites arguing that
Astrology is a part of science with click-bait titles. In 2011, Psychology
Today published an article titled ‘Science Confirms Astrology’. There was no
substance in that piece.
Sadly (or
fortunately for the astrologers), over 90 percent of adults know their zodiac
sign. In several surveys, it was found that over half of these agree their
signs’ character descriptions are a good fit for them.
This trend has
now qualified astrology as a full-fledged profession. There are even institutes
out there that are offering courses in astrology and provide certificates to
aspirants. Needless to say, they are all making an awful lot of money this way.
And this thing isn’t ending anytime soon. If anything, under false claims and
proves, astrology is only growing to different parts of the world.
In short, given the missing evidence, astrology qualifies as pseudoscience!!! Many people still believe it though!
0 Comment
Blogger | Posted on
0 Comment
Blogger | Posted on
If anyone from the scientific community still believes in irrational things, that means the person is unable to overcome his or her cultural/ religious/emotional conditioning of his/her mind with scientific reasoning and is not fit to be a scientist.
0 Comment
Blogger | Posted on
0 Comment
@letsuser | Posted on
0 Comment