sales | Posted on 3-Jun-2019 | others

If Government in India dont involve on churches and Mosques then why do they involve in tirumala tirupathi devasthanam?so,do these politicians take hindu temples as granted?do they dont undertake reputed mosques and churches for vote bank?

0

Blogger | Posted on 5-Jun-2019

Though India is considered as a secular country, it is good to be in theory only as in practice; there are lots of events where the government has taken surprising steps for Hindu temples. The Hindu temples have been a soft target for various rulers and for the current government is also there is nothing called deviation. The politicians who are also so-called Hindus try to polarize the votes on the basis of sensitive issues related to Hindu temples, but when it comes to mosque or church, they just leave the matter saying it is their personal matter.

Letsdiskuss courtesy: Jagran

The main cause behind this poor mindset is lack of Unity in Hindus, which cannot keep the concerned politicians away from the issues saying that it is the religious matter of Hindus. The surprising fact is that even Supreme Court has also given some verdicts about a few of the religious matters which obviously does not believe in any religion. But again the judgement of the apex court is restricted to the Hindu temples and community only, and hence Hindus feel supportless when it comes to religious matters that are backed by the politics, law and so-called politicians.

The incident of Sabarimala temple. Tirumala Tirupathi Devsthanam and Shani Shingnapur temple can be the best examples where politicians divided Hindus in favour and against of the concerned temple.

1

0

P

pravesh ppcexpert

Blogger | Posted on 4-Jun-2019

At autonomy of India, minorities don't get effectively supported in current circumstance. They need much assistance get supported in framework. So minorities are given a few benefits like you notice.

Letsdiskuss

This is same as SC/ST given reservation on arrangement of nation. Around then reservations are ridiculous much required. However at this point dislike so. Dr Ambedkar who was the seat of the board that shaped the Indian constitution, has never referenced that booking ought to be disappeared. So I think, he committed an error or complete some help to networks, by not setting a period limit in reservations. For instance 50 years, after 50 yrs the law will be prohibited from constitution and reservations offered by financial status of individuals. I don't think this will ever happen same as government will never takeover mosque and chruch, not simply like sanctuary.

1

0