Anita Pandey 's avatar

Anita Pandey

Updated on Jun 18, 2026•education

Who killed Aurangzeb?

1
4 Answers
T
Tara Verma
Aurangzeb Mughal History & South Asian Historical Events Researcher Analyst
Answered on Jun 17, 2026

Aurangzeb was not killed by anyone.

He died a natural death on March 3, 1707, in Ahmednagar (Deccan region) at the age of about 88–89 years.

What actually happened?

  • Aurangzeb spent the last years of his life in military campaigns in the Deccan.
  • He became very old and weak due to age and long wars.
  • He fell ill and gradually his health declined.
  • He died due to old age-related illness, not assassination or murder.

Key point:

There is no historical evidence that Aurangzeb was killed.
He was one of the few Mughal emperors who died of natural causes after a long reign.

Also read : Was Aurangzeb a hero or a villain?

T
ABOUT THE AUTHORTara Verma

Tara Verma is a practising teacher and education content writer with over 10 years of classroom experience across primary and secondary levels. She holds a Master's degree in Education (M.Ed.) from Delhi University and a Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) from Jamia Millia Islamia — qualifications that ground her writing in both pedagogical theory and the day-to-day realities of teaching in India. Her content covers exam preparation strategies, learning methodologies, curriculum guidance, student mental health, career counselling for students, and the evolving state of school and higher education in India. Her work has appeared on platforms including TeacherVision India, Jagran Josh, and Careers360, where she writes for students, parents, and fellow educators who need content built on actual teaching experience — not theory alone. Over a decade of working directly with students across age groups and learning levels has given Tara a practical understanding of how education content should be written — clearly, accessibly, and with genuine awareness of the challenges students and teachers face on the ground. She has taught 1,000+ students, contributed to school curriculum development initiatives, and published 250+ articles on education across digital platforms. She is an active member of the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) India. Across all her writing, every recommendation is classroom-tested, every insight comes from direct teaching experience, and every article is held to the same standard she applies in her own classroom — accuracy, clarity, and genuine usefulness for the reader.

React
avatar
Mohd Sameer
Answered on Oct 11, 2023

Aurangzeb, the 6th Mughal head of India, kicked the bucket on Walk 3, 1707. His passing was not the consequence of homicide or death, yet rather because of normal causes. Aurangzeb governed for almost 50 years, from 1658 to 1707, and after a long rule loaded up with military missions and political battles, he passed on in Ahmednagar, present-day Maharashtra, India, at 88 years old.

Aurangzeb's passing denoted the conclusion of a critical age in Mughal history and had significant ramifications for the fate of the Mughal Domain. Following his demise, the Mughal Domain confronted a decrease in dependability and power, as ensuing rulers attempted to keep up with the realm's solidarity and command over its huge regions.

It's vital to take note of that the verifiable occasions encompassing Aurangzeb's life and the conditions of his demise are subjects of academic review and continuous authentic discussions. Various antiquarians could give differing understandings in light of accessible records and sources.

Letsdiskuss

Also Read :- Who killed Muhammad ghori ?

1
V
Viku Singh
Updated on Oct 10, 2023

Aurangzeb, the final prominent ruler of the Mughal Empire, passed away on February 20, 1707, while in his camp at Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, at the age of 88. His reign had endured for 49 years, and the precise cause of his demise remains shrouded in mystery, with several conjectures proposed.

Some suggest that Aurangzeb succumbed to natural factors, such as the ravages of old age and illness. In the years preceding his death, he had grappled with numerous health issues, including malaria, dysentery, and gout.

Conversely, there are suspicions that he might have been a victim of poisoning, potentially at the hands of his own son, Bahadur Shah I, who subsequently ascended to the throne. Bahadur Shah harbored ambitions for the imperial seat and was eager to seize power.

Another perspective posits that Aurangzeb might have met his end through the actions of his own attendants. On the day of his passing, several of his servants were discovered lifeless within his chambers. It is conceivable that they were either part of a conspiracy to assassinate the emperor or chose to end their own lives following his demise.

Regardless of the specific cause of his death, Aurangzeb's passing signified the conclusion of the Mughal Empire's zenith. His rule was characterized by religious intolerance and internal strife, and his successors grappled with maintaining the empire's coherence. Eventually, in the 18th century, the Mughal Empire crumbled, paving the way for British colonization in India.

Aurangzeb remains an intricate and contentious historical figure. He demonstrated remarkable military acumen and administrative prowess, expanding the Mughal Empire to its zenith. However, he also wielded a merciless and intolerant rule, persecuting Hindus and other non-Muslims while demolishing numerous Hindu temples and religious sites.

The demise of Aurangzeb marked a pivotal juncture in Indian history, denoting the conclusion of an epoch and the inception of a new one. India underwent profound transformations thereafter, never returning to its prior state.

Letsdiskuss

Also Read- Who is Aurangzeb?

1
avatar
Anita Pandey
Answered on Apr 2, 2022

Bundela Veer Chhatrasal had killed Aurangzeb and made an incision on his body exactly as Mahaprabhu ji had said.Due to which Aurangzeb kept on suffering by staying in bed for 3 months.Similarly, he died in agony.Aurangzeb was the richest and most powerful man of his time.He is said to have lived a pious life and was free from all vices.Which was found in the kings of his time.He was restrained in his eating habits.

Letsdiskuss

Also Read :- Which Sikh gurus were killed by the Mughals?

1