Why didn-t the British destroy any Indian heritage but the Mughals destroyed all?

Brits despite the fact that focused on wrecking Indian progress, were cleverer than Turks.

Brits comprehended that mistreatment and defacement will just build Hindu displeasure and fuel revolts - consequently making their employment of administering and misusing India basically outlandish.

Turks had committed this error and British were sharp not to rehash it.

Furthermore, Brits comprehended that sanctuaries and symbols are just outside articulation of a culture.

Just crushing it won't pulverize the way of life itself - which depends on conviction and thoughts.

They comprehended that pulverizing Indian culture and religion must be done at a philosophical level.

So they utilized the shrewd strategy for making Indians disdain their own religion and culture.

For this they presented English training in India - in which Macaulay assumed a significant job.