Afghans lost war since they weren't gifted warrior as the Sikhs. Nobody could coordinate to them. I am Maratha and even we required their assistance in battling the Afghans in 1759 yet offered governorship to Adina Beg for 75 lakhs every year. Just if Maratha wouldn't have pillaged and plundered Delhi, they most likely could have unified and vanquished the Afghans in the third skirmish of panipat. So it was exercise learnt for Maratha Empire.
Abdali's goods included 22,000 Maratha ladies being taken to Afghanistan to be sold into bondage. In transit they were to be utilized by the Afghan officers to fulfill their desire.
0
0
0
teacher | Posted on
- Incredible initiative of Sikhs, in the Sikh side; for both the Misl period just as the Sikh domain time, there were pioneers who were very effective; these incorporate Baba Deep Singh Ji, King Maharaja Ranjit Singh, Hari Singh Nalwa, and Akali Phula Singh. During the Battle of Saragahari initiative was additionally proficient.
- Afghans had no motivation to battle, when contrasted with Sikhs. During each experience the Afghans battle the Sikhs inside the Punjab; they were more keen on taking war plunder than prevailing. In the fights with the Sikh realm there was nothing that was especially imperative to them.
- Sikh spirit was higher, the Sikhs had more to protect their region, at that point the Afghans needed to overcome it, just as safeguard the kidnapped ladies from the Marathas.
- Inner issues in Afghanistan, Abdali was the "unifier" of Afghanistan; in any case, there were still issues back home particularly with potentially success by others.
0
0
0