Join this conversation
Researchers most unquestionably under man's definition. Sacred text expresses all things were made by him, both seen and concealed. That nothing is made of what we think it is. How all he made cooperates and keeps on doing as such, everything in its appropriate place working in the manner in which it was planned, until the point that he closes it.
What's more, he is quite a lot more.
Unfortunately, it would mean the interposition of a blasphemous layer of power between us and God, which would really *****. Eventually, we'd have to rise up, kill it, and take its place, probably with huge loss of life. We have a pretty good track record for that sort of thing, so we could probably pull it off. But we'd be no closer to God than we are now, except in the sense that we'd have removed this obstacle.
The theory of refuting God as not what he is portrayed as in our religious books, myths, and legends. For that, we can go back to Victorian Era where Charles Darwin’s theory of Evolution left everyone scandalized as he directly questioned the involvement of God in the creation of life on Earth, as we are told in the Book of Genesis. NASA too rejects the miraculous appearance of creatures on Earth in favor of Darwin’s theory.