What makes you think they have? Peruse cautiously:
Feature: Unsealing of Christ's Reputed Tomb Turns Up New Revelations
"Presumed". If you don't mind consider the decision of that term. Rumored by whom? Not archeologists, however in the generally fanciful, Christian custom.
Introduction: "Scientists have proceeded with their examination concerning the site where the assortment of Jesus Christ is customarily accepted to have been covered… "
"generally accepted". No case is being made for accuracy.
"bits of the tomb are as yet present today" - however what tomb? The tomb under scrutiny; not explicitly that of a specific, authentic character.
Content body: "While it is archeologically difficult to state that the tomb as of late revealed in the Church of the Holy Sepulcher is the entombment site of an individual Jew known as Jesus of Nazareth… " Do you see it now? There is no known association with what you need.
"roundabout proof to recommend that the distinguishing proof of the site by agents of the Roman sovereign Constantine somewhere in the range of 300 years after the fact might be a sensible one." Yes, it is old and might be fourth century. Notwithstanding, the custom for Constantine's mom discovering Christian locales is most likely either legendary, or a fake; the literary convention for his change is ludicrous (on his deathbed… ). Thus imagine a scenario where it's fourth century.
On the off chance that you are perusing this for affirmation, it would be ideal if you proceed - you are liberated to be as wrong as you need.