teacher | Posted on
Truly, it is a bombed majority rules system in contrast with different countries. It has reasons in light of the fact that the symbol heads of India had neglected to think about the future majority rules system of India. Gandhi was the well known pioneer, he was unable to consider it. He was such a major chief, yet why he neglected to fulfill the Muslims? Why he made the Muslims the foe of Hindus? Why he had relinquished Khan Abdul Gaffer Khan, who was no not as much as Gandhi as on the grounds that he was a Muslim? In USA Black and White could live individuals together, we the Indians no distinction in shading, taste, or entertainment, why we were unable to live respectively? Is it the proficiency of initiative to be respected with title "Father" of the country by passing the constitution of India? Why? Did the Muslims are not the resident of India? I'm not catching our meaning by majority rules system, it is balance, organization and fraternity? Where is uniformity in India when we send our up-and-comer as Dalit, as a Hindu or as a Muslim?
Gandhi used religion in governmental issues and had brought the division. His development was "Peacefulness". It is only resistance of Hindu religion. He had befooled the Indians by his spiritualist and devastated India. Is there anything on earth that could be satisfied by peacefulness?
It was viciousness in USA, common war among high contrast, yet behind savagery, the country of USA appeared as a country of super-power, it is upset in French, yet behind brutality, the genuine vote based system developed out of despotism, nuclear bomb utilized out of savagery yet behind nuclear bomb, atomic vitality became exposed, space rocket, software engineering came into the earth. By Gandhi's peacefulness Indian lost their solidarity, Indians made the Muslims foe.
Today India is unreliable in view of the making of Pakistan, as a result of the Muslims, who were made foe, anyway great of Hindu-Muslim is stated, regardless, a Muslim consistently think, I am a Muslim; I am unique in relation to Hindus of India and I have been avoided Hindus. This is the formation of Gandhi. Popular government is decimated by Gandhi, yet Gandhi is regarded exceptionally in India. It is nature of Indians, not to criticize anyone since Hinduism depends on "penance "and "resilience".
It was a result of the shortcoming of Hindus, the frail strict morals have been brought into Hindu religion. The shortcoming of Hinduism is decimating the Hindu humanity. Initially this sort of shortcoming was not in Hinduism. Krishna, the Hindu God or King said to Arjun, take arms and battle for right. Yet, Gandhi said inverse don't take arms, never battle for right, rather penance. Is it Hindu-religion or a wound religion to pulverize India and become a symbol by non - viciousness.
A nation which has no vision can't get by with popular government. Where is majority rules system, where I know in Assam or in Bengal consistently 3 lakh matric up-and-comer by and large course and 2′5 lakh madra-up-and-comer why? Is it the objective of fairness or popular government? Sanskrit for Hindus or Arabic for Muslims can it not be a subject in the overall course and treat them all equivalent.
Where is equity or majority rules system, where the legislature proclaimed that the Hindu individuals of Pakistan or Bangladesh will be Indian resident following seven years? Is there any rationale in it? The rationale is vote in favor of intensity. These are spine less powerless pioneer. The individuals who battled for autonomy, who ought to be respected with gold, saved a side for political increase. These individuals are not to be fit to be the pioneer of the country. Without a dream a nation can't endure, likewise a man without morals of equity, can't be a pioneer of humanity.
0
0
0
@dataanalyst | Posted on
We cannot say this its a failed one just because we are not getting want we want.
I am not supporting any party or anyone just want to discuss on this topic.
The first thing we are a country with having huge population and also we are big in size so it's not possible for any single person to manage everything I m not saying everyone is doing right there are many or we can say 50% peoples are doing wrong or they are just fooling peoples for their benefits but we have to understand we that till peoples will not come in front nothing will happen well.
Everyone thinks about their benefits when peoples start to think for others automatically everything gets good.
Why we blame any politician when we have selected them so we have to manage them whenever you see something wrong happening just raise your voice it will take time but something good will definitely happen.
0
0
0