When you are in politics you cannot be a good person, but you can always be a better politician than the other.
Concluding directly may not lead to a conclusion who is better than the other. The following basis of comparison need to be considered in deciding :
1. Image as a politician: Modi no doubt has a better image nationally as well as internationally. Political experts even consider Modi as a "brand".
2. Political Experience: It is said "the older the wine, the better it is" Thus the more experience you have the better edge you have over others. Modi has a long and diverse experience than Rahul and thus has a better hand over Gandhi.
3. Decisiveness: The power to take decisions which need guts and often invite brutal criticism. On this parameter, Modi and Rahul both weigh equally. Modi took the bold move of demonitisation and GST, whereas Rahul waived off the farm loans in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh.
4. Leadership: To state the leadership traits of a politician is a subjective task. Though both of them have the full command over their respective parties, both showed their leadership during the campaign rallies, but the style of their leadership is quite different. Where Modi is considered as an autocratic leader, Rahul is often seen as a Democratic leader (because he does not have as experience as Modi)
5. Vision: Modi believes in Capitalist structure where he is seen as a leader who believes that development through investments. Whereas RaGa is softer on his counterpart and a bit inclined towards Socialist pattern (as seen on his election manifestos of various states elections and general election)
Now the readers may decide themselves who is better than the other.
Answered By Mayank Gupta
Public Affairs Researcher
