Is the importance of God decreasing in present times? - letsdiskuss
Official Letsdiskuss Logo
Official Letsdiskuss Logo

Language


Rahul Mehra

System Analyst (Wipro) | Posted on | Astrology


Is the importance of God decreasing in present times?


0
0




Teacher | Posted on


The way people are today, and the way bad and sinful things are increasing, it seems that gos really have died. But still there are many who believe that God is still there.


It is said that where there is unrighteousness, there is righteousness; where there is death, there is birth; where there is lie, there is truth; similarly, where there is sin in Kalyuga, there is God. In Treta yuga, Lord Rama said to Hanuman that in every yuga (epoch), Hanuman will be there on Earth in the name of righteousness. And despite all the sinful activities, Earth is still in tact only because of the presence of God.

People still spend thousands of rupees on their religious activities, go to places like Vaishnodevi, observe the toughest of the fasts, and do whatever they can to keep the god happy. They do all this because the have faith in him. Despite the popularity of atheism, they count themselves as believers.

Letsdiskuss


0
0

Blogger | Posted on


Relies upon what you mean by religion. What's more, essential for what?

Remember that American Football is, by various measurements, a type of religion.

In the event that you mean some specific religion, at that point perhaps no.

Be that as it may, on the off chance that we consider religion in an increasingly unique and significant feeling of an arrangement of seeing and deciphering the world through organized pecking orders of significant worth, which permits us to infer meaning and to focus on objectives, while keeping our activities in accordance with that progression of qualities… at that point religion is completely vital. Jung's thought was that your most elevated virtue is God - by definition.

Despite the fact that the definition above is valid for all "religions" accordingly, it is likewise valid for nonbelievers. A nonbeliever may not have confidence in an old white fella, sitting on a cloud in the sky, yet they treat their most noteworthy virtues a similar that a strict individual treats the possibility of God. (Incidentally, that is not the genuine Judeo-Christian thought either, that is a Greek/Roman and Norse idea)

The essential closeness is that God is a wellspring of direction, which permits us to point our objectives appropriately, and act in a route as to practically understand those objectives. In doing as such, we are compelled to make forfeits to that God. Clearly, the most straightforward strict model is that of Abraham - with an exacting penance. Be that as it may, you make such forfeits whether you have faith in God or not, and you make them explicitly to your most elevated virtues. Since every one of our objectives require penances, the most significant standards require the majority of all. In addition to the fact that they take priority over different objectives, they drive us to forfeit these lesser objectives, to forfeit our present for the future that may never come, and so on.


0
0

Blogger , seo | Posted on


The intensity of confidence is in not having the capacity to see God but rather still have confidence in him. as per sacred texts, the measure of negative(crime, hatred,jealousy,etc) in the present day and age is to an extreme degree excessively and henceforth God would not show up until the point that he has a reason for decimation or entertainment, up to that point he will test our confidence in all conceivable ways. God appears to his most loved individuals even today however you wouldn't trust them… to have the capacity to see God you must have no negative goals in your psyche for anybody and extreme want for encountering a definitive truth of life.


0
0

Blogger | Posted on


Relies upon what you mean by religion. Also, fundamental for what?

Remember that American Football is, by various measurements, a type of religion.

In the event that you mean some specific religion, at that point conceivably no.

Be that as it may, in the event that we consider religion in a progressively conceptual and significant feeling of an arrangement of seeing and deciphering the world through organized pecking orders of significant worth, which permits us to determine meaning and to focus on objectives, while keeping our activities in accordance with that chain of importance of qualities… at that point religion is completely fundamental. Jung's thought was that your most noteworthy virtue is God - by definition.

In spite of the fact that the definition above is valid for all "religions" thusly, it is additionally valid for skeptics. A nonbeliever may not have faith in an old white man, sitting on a cloud in the sky, yet they treat their most noteworthy virtues a similar that a strict individual treats the possibility of God. (Coincidentally, that is not the genuine Judeo-Christian thought either, that is a Greek/Roman and Norse idea)

The significant comparability is that God is a wellspring of direction, which permits us to point our objectives appropriately, and act in a path as to practically understand those objectives. In doing as such, we are compelled to make forfeits to that God. Clearly, the least demanding strict model is that of Abraham - with an exacting penance. Be that as it may, you make such forfeits whether you put stock in God or not, and you make them explicitly to your most noteworthy virtues. Since every one of our objectives require penances, the most significant standards require a large portion of all. In addition to the fact that they take priority over different objectives, they constrain us to forfeit these lesser objectives, to forfeit our present for the future that may never come, and so forth.

As a development, we should take note of that the capacity to have a general public (which involves getting a ton of individuals to see the world a similar way and work for similar objectives) has been practiced uniquely by strict thoughts, or by working off of old strict thoughts. Truly, no mainstream society has ever jumped up all alone. Indeed, even the mainstream social orders today were based on the former strict ones; or rather on the common collective thoughts gave by those religions. You can drop the religion, however except if the mutual philosophy of a populace simply tumbled from the sky (it didn't), it depended on a first strict thoughts. Clearly, not all the strict thoughts persist, however the center social ones do.


0
0

Picture of the author