This question is often asked in general knowledge, but it needs a clear and accurate understanding.
In reality, no state in India was completely free from British control during the colonial period.
The British either directly ruled regions or controlled them indirectly through princely states. Many princely states had their own rulers, but they were still under British supervision and influence.
So even though some areas had internal autonomy, they were not fully independent.
The only region often mentioned in discussions is Goa, but it was ruled by the Portuguese, not free from foreign rule.
Therefore, it is incorrect to say that any Indian state remained entirely untouched by foreign domination. No Indian state was completely independent of foreign control during that time, as all were influenced either by the British or other colonial powers.
