Feminism stands as a magnified wave in today's scenario. Initiated by "Elaine Showalter", it now comes up in a highly misinterpreted notion than what it was supposed to be. Feminism precisely, demands gender equality to help women come at par with the patriarchal norms of the society and cope up with the stigma of the second sex, which they have been subjected to since times immemorial.
Bollywood, stands as a major influence and therefore, it tends to take up what so ever is "trending" as its major subject. It must not be ignored that the film fraternity is indeed one major flag bearer of Male chauvinism,and thus, when such an industry faces women who are just not dolled up to be the "Chikni Chamelis" and "Munnis", and rather have a voice of their own, they are- "BAFFLED".
What concerns me most is not the fact that movies like "Veere di Wedding" and "Lipstick Under my Burkha" faced oppression, but the curiosity, that why wasn't such an aggressive outlook shown towards "Gangs of Wassepur" or "Grand Masti"??
Women in Indian media, are only supposed to be the "Bandini" and "Paro" who wait as a damsel in distress, waiting for their price charming, who would in turn be their "pati Parmeshwar" no matter how useless he might be. He has to be worshiped for being "The Man".
The outspoken sexuality isn't the right of women in this country, where they are not yet "permitted" to breathe an air of Independence, how can we expect a whole lot of revolution in the three hours of silver screen hypocrisy?
Therefore, in my opinion, the problem is not in the 'content' of these movies, but with the 'narrow minded' Indian society, which can never come at par with the fact of women, being as human as men are.