India be in a better position had it been ruled by Indians and not British?Add Answer
It isn't something I regularly talk about in light of the fact that it is not something to be pleased with - an incredible inverse.
Be that as it may, as India commends 70 years of autonomy, this individual connection has made me consider India's perplexing and regularly conflicting mentalities to Britain.
What India considers us is seemingly more significant now than any other time in recent memory, given how much the British government is nailing to our future relationship with this tremendous and progressively powerful country.
Theresa May picked India as her first major abroad visit as head administrator intentionally. As Britain looks towards its post-Brexit future, it is connecting with India for help.
The head administrator trusts that reviving the UK's exchanging attaches with our previous state can shape a significant piece of the nation's new worldwide monetary procedure.
However, India's reaction to her suggestions has been unmistakably lukewarm, and maybe all things considered.
For some, the Anglo-Indian relationship is summarized in symbols, for example, chicken tikka masala, presently viewed by some as our national dish, a 16 ounces of Kingfisher.
Be that as it may, for some Indians, the history they "share" with us is one of embarrassment: wicked slaughters, mass captures, the concealment of equitable political developments and the overriding of its indigenous societies to make a servile, anglicized world class.